|


| |
|
Title |
Motor
Registry Project |
|
Duration |
1-day workshop |
|
The Client |
Motor Registry Project
Team, Department of Infrastructure, Energy & Resources, Tasmania |
|
Participants |
Invited participants included representatives
from: -
·
Department of Tourism, Parks,
Heritage and the Arts
·
Department of Police and Public
Safety
·
Department of Premier and
Cabinet
·
Department of Treasury and
Finance
·
Department of Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources
·
Department of Justice and
Industrial Relations
·
Department of Primary Industry,
Water and Environment
·
Southcom Pty Ltd
·
Motor Registry
Project Unit
|
|
Background |
The Motor
Registry Project is a complex project. It has dependencies and
relationships with a number of other projects across government
and has the potential to have a significant impact on agencies.
In order to clarify the expectations of the
members of the Inter Agency Steering Committee and other key
personnel from across government and to gain a shared
understanding of the issues associated with the project, the
project team arranged a value management workshop. |
|
Objective |
To Clarify Government
customers’ expectations of the Motor Registry Project.
|
|
Outcome |
·
Key issues associated with the
project were identified and prioritised.
·
The purpose and scope of the
individual Business Initiative Projects were agreed and
participants gained a better understanding of the project.
·
The draft list of Business
Initiative Projects (BIP’s) was reviewed, prioritised and the
initiatives to be implemented were agreed.
·
It was considered the Motor
Registry Project will be the demonstrated project for Whole of
Government co-operation
·
It became evident that the
title "Motor Registry Project" did not reflect the Whole of
Government nature of the project. Whilst the Motor
Registry system is central and important to the project
deliverables, a name change to better reflect the Whole of
Government nature of the project should be considered. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Rooke
Mall Redevelopment |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
The Client |
Devonport City
Council – Devonport is located
midway along the northern coast of Tasmania and is the home port
for the Spirit of Tasmania, the Bass Strait Passenger Ferries
operated by a Tasmanian Government Business Enterprise.
|
|
Participants |
37 participants representing
·
The general public
·
Rooke Street traders and
property owners
·
Fourways traders
·
South Rooke Street retailers
·
Stewart Street retailers
·
Other local businesses
·
The Devonport Chamber of
Commerce and Industry
·
Council elected members and
staff
·
Youth
·
Tasmania Police
·
Devonport Community and Health
Services Centre
·
Devonport Commercial Promotions |
|
Background |
Devonport City Council has adopted an
initiative called “New Horizons”. This is a financial and
structural commitment to substantially enhance the heart and
face of Devonport. It is the most important initiative
undertaken by the Council in the past 10 years.
The Rooke Street Mall is a major element of
this initiative. |
|
Objective |
To agree on a concept for the redevelopment
of the Rooke Street Mall that takes account of the related
development in adjacent areas |
|
Outcome |
·
Essential functions were agreed
·
Key stakeholders were
identified
·
Critical issues were identified
and prioritised
·
A theme for the Mall was agreed
that gave the option of having a Mall that excludes traffic, but
retains the option of shared vehicle access in the future |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Enhancement of the Entrance to Strahan |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
The Client |
Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources - Asset Management Branch
– “owner” of the State Road Network, and
responsible for ensuring value for money in the expenditure of
funds on the network. |
|
Participants |
13 participants representing
·
Strahan Commercial and Tourism
enterprises
·
Strahan residents
·
The West Coast Council elected
members and staff
·
Hobart Ports Authority
·
Emergency Services
·
Transport operators
·
State Development
·
Primary Industry, Water and
Environment
·
Tourism Tasmania, and
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources |
|
Background |
The State Government, recognising that
Strahan is one of Tasmania’s premier tourist destinations,
allocated $600,000 of infrastructure funding to enhance the
entrances into Strahan. |
|
Objective |
To explore enhancement opportunities for the
access to Strahan |
|
Outcome |
·
Critical road functions were
agreed
·
Key stakeholders were
identified
·
Critical Issues were
identified, and
·
A number of short term
projects, with indicative costs, to a value of $600,000 were
identified and agreed with an order of priority |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Partnering Workshop - Sorell Causeway Bridge Replacement |
|
Duration |
1-day workshop |
|
The Client |
Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources - Road Programs Branch
– responsible for procurement of road and bridge construction
and maintenance services, on behalf of the Asset Management
Branch, for the State Road Network |
|
Participants |
13 participants representing
·
John Holland Pty Ltd management
and construction staff
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
Pitt and Sherry Consulting
Engineers, and
·
Millin EMS Pty Ltd |
|
Background |
The Sorell Causeway Bridge is located on the
Tasman Highway, a major arterial link to dormitory suburbs to
the east of Hobart as well as being an important tourist link to
Port Arthur and the East Coast of Tasmania. The bridge
replacement project is valued at $14 million. |
|
Objective |
To establish a framework and processes for a
working relationship for the parties to the Sorell Causeway
Bridge Replacement contract, that is consistent with their
contractual obligations |
|
Outcome |
·
Staff from the major players in
the project gained an understanding of perspectives of other
parties to the contract.
·
Networking and communication
between parties to the contract was enhanced.
·
A common understanding of key
issues confronting the project and working relationships on the
project were identified and agreed.
·
A conflict resolution process
and a Performance Evaluation process and associated procedures
were identified and agreed. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Port
of Launceston - Bell Bay Road Infrastructure |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
The Client |
Port of Launceston
Pty Ltd - one of four major ports
in Tasmania. It is located at the mouth of the Tamar river in
the north of the state. |
|
Participants |
23 participants representing
·
George Town Council elected
members and staff
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
Bell Bay area businesses
·
Port Stevedoring companies
·
Port of Launceston Pty Ltd
·
Road maintenance contractors
|
|
Background |
Through put at the Port has increased
significantly over the past twelve months putting pressure on
the existing road network and supporting infrastructure.
The network in and adjacent to the port has
three separate owners and there is no agreed management and
communication strategy to ensure integration and coordination of
management of the transport infrastructure. |
|
Objective |
To identify appropriate road infrastructure
and management processes to facilitate industrial operations in
the Bell Bay area; key issues and stakeholders; location and
design parameters for a B-Double weighbridge; and an alternative
access to the port area. |
|
Outcome |
·
A Bell Bay Access Group was
formed with the composition agreed; terms of reference
identified; operating details identified; and an action plan for
implementation detailed.
·
Similarly, a Port User Group
was established. The structure, terms of reference, modus
operandi and objectives were identified.
·
An alternative access to the
port area and a preferred location for a B-Double weighbridge
was identified.
·
An action plan was agreed to
advance the workshop outcomes. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Southwood Project – The Wood Centre to the Huon Highway |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
The Client |
Forestry Tasmania
- a government business enterprise responsible for the
management, development and harvesting of native forests and
plantations on Crown Land not reserved as national parks or
heritage areas. |
|
Participants |
29 participants representing
·
Local affected residents
·
Huon Valley Council
·
Local primary School
·
Local Business
·
Huonville Business Association
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
Forestry Tasmania
·
Technical experts (sociology
and engineering) |
|
Background |
The Southwood area west of Huonville is a
major source of wood resource in southern Tasmania.
The project is highly contentious with the
community split between supporting and opposing the concept. The
potential for heavy vehicles to be travelling past residential
areas has evoked highly emotional responses from those
potentially affected. |
|
Objective |
To identify the preferred product transport
route from the Wood Centre to the Huon Highway; key issues and
stakeholders; road infrastructure improvements with an
implementation plan; amenity and services mitigation strategies;
and a project communication strategy. |
|
Outcome |
·
The preferred route, supported
by the majority of participants was identified.
· The specific additional work
that would progress the project was also identified.
·
Key issues were agreed.
·
Communication was identified as
a key issue and a communication strategy was developed.
·
Workshop participants stated
that as a result of the workshop, they were much better informed
about the project. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Sorell
Causeway Bridge Replacement |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources |
|
Participants |
34 participants representing
·
Sorell, Tasman and Clarence
Councils
·
Midway Point residents
·
Local Businesses
·
Midway Point Yacht Club
·
South East Regional Development
Association
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
Primary Industry, Water and
Environment
·
Hobart Water
·
Metro Tasmania Pty Ltd
·
Telstra
·
Consulting Engineers
·
Tourism Tasmania
·
Royal Automobile Club of
Tasmania
·
Tasmania Police
·
Federal Airports Corporation -
Emergency Services |
|
Background |
The Sorell Causeway and Bridge are critical
elements in Tasmania’s Strategic Road Network, forming a gateway
from Hobart to the East Coast of Tasmania and the Tasman
Peninsula.
Whilst the bridge is currently in a safe
condition, Infrastructure Energy and Resources has decided to
replace the bridge for the following reasons:
·
deteriorating condition of the
existing bridge
·
need for improvement of road
user functionality to cope with increased traffic demand
·
need for provision for
increased loads from heavier vehicles |
|
Objective |
To agree, in broad
terms, the scope of the project to replace the existing bridge. |
|
Outcome |
·
A preferred route alignment and
cross-section were agreed. Critical issues were identified and
essential functions were agreed.
·
Important facts relating to the
bridge, essential services carried by the bridge, emergency
services, environmental constraints, traffic volumes and tourist
traffic, residents concerns, adjacent aquaculture business
concerns, space constraints on alignment, impact on local
residents and public expectations were identified.
·
An action plan to further the
project was agreed. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Review
of the Sealing Business Unit operations |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Civil Construction
Corporation |
|
Participants |
16 participants representing
·
Civil Construction Corporation
senior management, operations and the Sealing Business Unit
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
B P Australia
·
Roadways Pty Ltd
·
Boral Construction Materials
Group
·
Local businesses and farmers |
|
Background |
The Sealing Business
Unit has sustained relatively small losses over the last three
years. Its share of the market has shrunk dramatically and the
Unit lacks organisation. The work of the Unit is acknowledged as
high quality and the Unit is competitive. However, the Unit is
operating in a mature product market that returns low margins on
investment and the work is capital intensive. |
|
Objective |
To determine the
long-term (five years) viability of the Sealing Business Unit.
·
Specifically to identify key
issues;
·
Identify key stakeholders (why
they are key, and what their relationship is with the Sealing
Business Unit);
·
Gain an understanding of how
the Sealing Business Unit operates and interacts with the other
Business Units in Civil Construction Corporation;
·
Identify how the Sealing
Business Unit contributes to Civil Construction Corporation’s
business strategies;
·
Identify a robust structure
within which the Sealing Business Unit can operate that meets
organisation, contract administration and resource management
needs;
·
Identify enhancement
opportunities;
·
Identify the benefits and
disbenefits of keeping the Sealing Business Unit in house and
agree whether or not to continue with the Sealing Business Unit
in house. |
|
Outcome |
The key issues and
stakeholders were identified. Sufficient information was
identified at the workshop to enable the Chief Executive
Officer, who attended the workshop , to decide the most
appropriate course of action.
The functions of the
Business Unit and its interaction with the other Business Units
were identified and strategies were identified to deal with the
key issues facing the Sealing Business Unit should it remain in
house. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Maidstone Park Complex |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Devonport City
Council |
|
Participants |
22 participants representing
·
Devonport City Council elected
members, management and staff
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
Education
·
Spreyton Primary School
·
Maidstone Park Controlling
Authority
·
Devon Netball Association
Incorporated
·
Morse’s Coaches
·
Beaumont Coaches
·
Bay Drive Land Owner/Developer
and local residents. |
|
Background |
In and around
Maidstone Park there exists a diversity of needs. Stakeholders
include the Spreyton Primary School, users of the Maidstone Park
Sporting Complex, users of the Transfer Station, local
residents, local businesses, parents delivering and picking up
children from the primary school, buses transporting secondary
students to Colleges in and around the Devonport area and
traffic using Mersey Main Road. |
|
Objective |
To determine a
strategy for overall access management for Spreyton Primary
School, the Maidstone Park Complex and the Transfer Station that
leads to improved safety and caters for future development,
commercial needs in the immediate area and school bus
interchange and parking needs. |
|
Outcome |
Key issues and
stakeholders were identified and a preferred option identified
that met all stakeholder needs at a significant cost saving to
the Council. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Frankford Main Road Planning Study |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources |
|
Participants |
24 departmental representatives attended |
|
Background |
The Department had
appointed consultants to undertake a strategic assessment of the
future role of Frankford Main Road in inter-regional freight
movement between Devonport and Launceston. |
|
Objective |
To provide the
Frankford Main Road Strategic Assessment Study Team with
guidance on the formulation and evaluation of Role options for
the future of Frankford Main Road. |
|
Outcome |
Key issues were
identified. Four options were identified. The fourth option was
discarded as not providing value for money when assessed against
criteria developed at the workshop. The decision about which of
the other options was preferred requires further investigation
of the possibility of inter-modal transfer of freight to rail in
the vicinity of Deloraine. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Launceston Eastern Ring Road |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources - Land Transport Planning Branch
|
|
Participants |
25 participants representing
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
Launceston City Council elected
members and staff
·
Transend
·
Pitt and Sherry
·
Metro
·
Heritage Forest Committee
·
Aurora
·
Port of Launceston Authority
·
Chamber of Commerce
·
Primary Industry, Water and
Environment
·
Mowbray Industry
·
R A C T
·
Business North. |
|
Background |
Infrastructure, Energy
and Resources and the Launceston City Council agreed a review of
the various Transportation Studies of Launceston was appropriate
to determine the optimum option for an Eastern Bypass of the
City having regard for the elements now in place since the
original study in 1962. |
|
Objective |
To review the need and
function of a road corridor on the eastern side of the
Launceston Central Business District, including overall
feasibility, value for money and community acceptance. |
|
Outcome |
During the workshop it
was soon very apparent that the issues currently facing
Launceston were far more complex than expected when the Value
Management Study was commissioned. The original concept
developed in 1962 needs a major review with a focus on how road
network development, land use, infrastructure and transport
services changes have impacted on the original concept.
A working group was
set up to further develop the options flagged during the
workshop. These options are to be presented, by the working
group, to a reconvened workshop in March 1999. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Margate and Southern Port Development |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Infrastructure,
Energy and Resources |
|
Participants |
29 participants representing
·
Infrastructure, Energy and
Resources
·
Forestry Tasmania
·
Hobart Ports Corporation
·
Kingborough Council elected
members, management and staff
·
Kingborough/North West Bay
Progress Association
·
Margate businesses
·
Hazell Brothers
·
Primary Industry, Water and
Environment
·
Sinclair Knight Merz Pty Ltd
·
Huon Valley Council
·
AquaTas
·
Pitt and Sherry |
|
Background |
Two major proposals
for south of Hobart in the Kingborough and Huonville
Municipalities were in the planning stage. These proposals had
the potential to have a major impact on road transport movements
in the Municipalities. |
|
Objective |
The overall purpose
was to achieve agreement on a preferred freight transport
network to service the proposed Southern Port at Electrona. The
preferred network should accommodate the plans of stakeholders
and provide for orderly development of the transport network and
land usage over the next 20 to 30 years. |
|
Outcome |
·
Key issues and stakeholders
were identified and the necessary functions of the network were
agreed.
·
Upgrading of the Sandfly
Secondary Road was agreed as the preferred option to facilitate
east west movement from the Southern Forests development to the
proposed port facilities at Electrona.
·
A number of safety improvements
were identified for the Channel Highway and it was agreed that
there was no justification for the Margate Bypass in the near
future as a result of the proposed port developments at
Electrona or any of the other known proposed developments.
·
However, it was agreed that
further investigation and community consultation was required to
identify the bypass corridor. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Traffic Monitoring Program |
|
Duration |
1-day workshop |
|
Client |
Transport, Tasmania |
|
Participants |
17 departmental representatives attended |
|
Background |
Historically,
Transport, Tasmania undertook traffic monitoring of the State
Road Network. Senior Management in the Department considered
options for delivery of the monitoring program should be
explored to determine which gave the best value for money. |
|
Objective |
To examine the range of possible mechanisms
the Department can employ to deliver the Traffic Monitoring
program, and recommend a preferred option after giving due
consideration to all major relevant factors including
-stakeholder
needs -program requirements -projected scope of work, and -projected technology developments. |
|
Outcome |
·
Key issues were identified.
·
Participants agreed the Traffic
Monitoring program was far more complex than first thought. It
was recognised that the current delivery mechanism is inadequate
and more thought needs to be given to what data to collect.
·
Shrinking budgets and the
changing role of the Department are the key drivers for change.
·
Several options were identified
along with selection criteria. However, the participants agreed
more work was needed to better understand user needs and the
benefits and costs associated with the various options before a
preferred delivery option could be decided.
·
An action plan was developed to
achieve this outcome. |
Return to top of page
|
Title |
Cooperative Management Strategy Midlands Highway, Oatlands to Conara |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Transport, Tasmania |
|
Participants |
26 departmental representatives attended |
|
Background |
There are a number of
legislative environmental management requirements on the
Department regarding the management of the state road network
reservation.
This task is made more
difficult as a number of separate stakeholder operations may
affect the environmental integrity of the road reservation.
The Department decided
to involve key stakeholders in a workshop to develop a
management system to trial on the network. A National Protocol
System had been developed by ARRB Transport Research and this
was seen as a starting point for the workshop |
|
Objective |
To agree a
comprehensive approach to the management and conservation of
roadside biodiversity on the Midland Highway between Oatlands
and Conara. |
|
Outcome |
· A
framework for a Biodiversity Management System
was identified consisting of two streams –
Operating Protocols and Biodiversity Protocols.
· A
steering group was established to further the agreed outcomes
from the workshop. In
addition, basic functions of a biodiversity
management system were agreed as it was to undertake a pilot project
based on the Management System Framework developed at the workshop
|
Return to top of page
|
Title |
East
Devonport Access Road |
|
Duration |
2-day workshop |
|
Client |
Transport, Tasmania
and Devonport City Council |
|
Participants |
26 departmental and council representatives
attended |
|
Background |
The Devonport City
Council had a project proposal recommending construction of a
port access road. The report also identified other lower cost
options. The Council was seeking Federal Government funding
through the Department. |
|
Objective |
To ensure the
transport needs of the Port, the Mersey Yacht Club and Devonport
City Council were met; that key stakeholders and issues were
identified; and environmental issues were addressed. |
|
Outcome |
A number of
engineering imperatives, actions specific to the Devonport City
Council and the Devonport Port Authority and economic and
funding options were identified and developed. A final option
was identified with significant savings to the community. The
Federal Government funded the project. |
Return to top of page |